From the last debate of the Alberto Núñez Feijóo campaign, this Wednesday night, to avoid the face-to-face of the constituents, Pedro Sánchez and his vice-president, Sumer, leader of the Left Platform, on the one hand, and him and the extreme right of Vox, from Santiago Abascal, on the other. The first analyzes suggest a near consensus between who won – Díaz – and who lost – Abascal. It is very difficult to understand how this will influence Sunday’s vote, at a time when most polls expect a right-wing majority, with PP and Vox adding votes, but some still agreeing with a left-wing majority.
Since Feijóo was not more than expected – named less by three participants -, opinions are divided on the consequences of this absence: some conclude that Feijóo is the main loser, precisely because of the lack of appearance (and since this is a discussion of ideas, the previous one, where he faced Sánchez, was loud); Others argue that he did well to avoid the image ofticket Election”, in a debate in which Sánchez and Díaz did not hide their complicity (referring to themselves as “Pedro” and “Yolanda”) and did not distinguish themselves.
The PP leader insists he wants to govern alone and that he can achieve a majority, while refusing to talk about coalitions with Vox, although in recent weeks he has held talks with apostolic governments in 140 municipalities and four autonomous regions.
Although it was a tripartite conversation, the one-and-a-half-hour debate resulted in a two-sided debate (or one against two), Abascal criticized all the options of the current government – not mentioning the PP, but not refusing to defend Feijóo, for example, the minister in the drug trafficker Marcial Dorado Baúlche attacked him for his former friendship with the Bach argument. climate change, economics, feminism, gender violence…) and to defend reforms endorsed by both, namely electoral reform, carried out by Diaz.
Accusing the ruling coalition of relying on votes from Basque libertarians, Abascal said: “With Bild’s patriotism, they approved labor reform, I don’t know if they know it, but Bild doesn’t want the best for Spain”. Well, he was wrong. “Like you, Build voted against labor reform,” Diaz corrected.
“Mr. Feijo is embarrassed to appear in public with his partner, Mr. Abascal,” Sanchez said in a segment devoted to post-election deals. “Does it sound normal to you that Mr. Feijo is associated with a drug dealer?” Díaz asked Abascal. “I don’t think it’s normal to say that about someone who doesn’t exist,” replied the head of Vox.
Diaz, who assured Abascal that “I’m not afraid of you,” redefined the concept of consent and equated sexual abuse with rape when she attacked the gender self-determination law passed in March and the “one yes yes yes” law. “It ends with the assumption that half the population is innocent,” Abascal reiterated. “They make exceptional courts for men,” he asserted. “Don’t laugh at us,” replied Dias with irritation. “I’m asking for women to win and male chauvinists to lose,” Sanchez said in a final appeal to voters.
“For me, the most passionate and credible person in the debate is Yolanda Díaz,” political scientist Veronika Fuman advocated in a special post-debate edition of the newspaper’s election program. Country, Route 23 J. “The best protagonist is without a doubt Yolanda Díaz. 80% she had full attention, she led the discussion, she interrupted Abascal, she corrected Pedro Sánchez when necessary,” said Pablo Montesinos, journalist of the Huffington Post, in the same event.
Having already exchanged some messages with the famous leaders, moving forward, Montesinos added “In Genoa [sede madrilena do PP] They are quiet” and argued that this final debate “doesn’t affect Feijóo much”.
“Hardcore explorer. Extreme communicator. Professional writer. General music practitioner. Prone to fits of apathy.”